tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2319852259874715993.post3857024232115484518..comments2024-03-21T00:15:31.084-07:00Comments on Ancient African Writing Systems and Knowledge: Greek and TocharianDr. Clyde Wintershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01153945762719431061noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2319852259874715993.post-75022906027417281102019-10-05T21:18:13.399-07:002019-10-05T21:18:13.399-07:00There is zero evidence that Greek influenced Sansk...There is zero evidence that Greek influenced Sanskrit, proto-Greeek speakers moved OUT OF INDIA as per actual Vedic records and testimony, and Panini had zero contacts with Greek anyone. In addition, languages like Greeks have substantial Semitic and Altaic steppe influences completely devoid and not found in Vedic Sanskrit. Vedic Sanskrit is the purest of the entire IE language family with a mere 3% at best influence from Munda languages and Sanskrit does not infact have significant influences from any Munda or "Dravidian" languages. <br /><br />Also there is no evidence that "Dravidian" was the language of the Indus Valley, decipherment and studies of the Indus script clearly show the language of the Indus Valley WAS VEDIC SANSKRIT! The Vedic Chronology and Archeo-astronomy records show that the Indus Valley was a Vedic civilization and coincided with the Vedic era and all the rivers and place names of the Indus region are pure IE origin which would not be the case if any Aryan migration took place, in which case the rivers would be non-IE names. <br /><br />Also the "Greeks" were not a homogeneous people, never called themselves "Greeks" and identified under a monolithic "Greek" civilizational banner ever, and they were notorious plagiarist and copiers. <br /><br />The Greeks copied and plagiarized gods, deities, words, terms, ideas etc etc from ancient India to Near-East & Persia and ancient Egypt and assimilated them without giving proper direct credit to their sources whereas the latter did not.<br /><br />This disqualifies any "Greek" influence on Sanskrit, in addition to also considering the fact that Greeks suffered their worst humiliating defeat in the ancient India region and Alexander nearly lost his life trying to get past the Indus river and was too cowardly to face the Nanda empire and the fact that "Greeks" were originally phariahs and prisoners of the Achaemenid empire in the Bactria-Afghanistan region and were seen as outsiders and mlecchas by ancient Indians disqualifying them again from having any influence on Sanskrit. Also Panini going authentic archeo-astronomical dating completely predates any "Greek presence" in ancient India and he had the most refined working of the Sanskrit languages which later provided the creation of the linguistic field and the entire creation of formal logic and grammar refuting the claims in this article completely. <br /><br />The claims in this article are completely false with zero basis in reality and the facts and you don't seem to understand the actual evidence and history of India one bit and are simply parroting false outdated ideas and debunked theories just because it serves your false agenda. DanNeutronhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14645303886079656399noreply@blogger.com