Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Was King James a Black European?

Some researchers believe that King James, was a Black European. The picture of King James suggest that he may have been a Negro.


Here is a page from the King James ,Works, of 1616.
 -

Below is a comparison of a fake engraving of King James.

 -


On the left we have the original engraving, on the right a reproduction. It is clear in this comparison that in the fake engraving the artist has rounded the face of King James and made his lips thinner.The face had to be rounded , and less like the frontal hook nose of Blacks,to make the nose longer and more European. 

In doing this the artist present more neck in the fake version of King James than is evident in the original engraving on the left. In addition in this fake reproduction, King James' ear is slanted to accomodate the rounding of the face.

In the original engraving King James moustache is pointing down. In the fake King James engraving James is given a handlebar moustache.

There are other fake paintings used to imply that King James was white. The original:

 -


.

The Fake King James cover:


 -

 -

Below is an enlargement of the King James Leviathan cover.

 -

This enlargement of the King James’ Leviathan cover highlights the African character of King James. This picture compares favorably with pictures of other Africans/Negroes below is the picture of an Afar Sub-Saharan African.

 -

.
Afar man
.

12 comments:

BigApplz said...

Doesn't it matter that King James' parents were actually White people. Mary Queen of Scots and Henry Stuart. The entire argument for a Black King James comes from renderings from lithographs and not his actual known heritage. That is unacceptable.

deek said...

Silly, if James was a " Black European", wouldnt that throw into doubt whether one or bith of his parents were Black Europeans as well ??? Use logic.

Hint: The Stuarts were Black Europeans.

Kenny Martin said...

White people have never had any real history other than killing robbing stealing and raping cattle so they take black culture and try to turn it white these white animals are the lowest life form on the planet they carry all types of diseases and has started every war on this planet these are truly the devil's children this entire planet was all black white people are mutant Mountain monkeys

Unknown said...

Kenny your 100% correct

Bobby Biship said...

Kenny your 100% correct

Isaiah Israel said...

Mary n henry were blk

JOHNNY KILLROY said...

@kenny Martin.. I couldn't of said it better myself.. Tamahu's time is up on this planet

lesley mitchell said...

The ignorance displayed here is almost beyond belief. What evidence do you have beyond a couple of photshopped black and white engravings? I'll tell you - none. You will not be able to find ONE contemporary description of him that describe as anything but a pale coloured, red haired Scot, which he was. Stop trying to insert yourselves into British hisotory as you always get found out with the result that the world laughs at your stupidity.

Brad Ley said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Brad Ley said...

Please, get real. That original engraving King James, was done by Hendrik Hondius, showing the real James, yet based on an engraving. He is white, clear as day. James, also had red hair, and his mother was part French, also with red hair, and his father, was also a red head. There are dozens of engravings, and multiple paintings, all through his life. You are judging him, on an engraving, and images, that have been faked, doctored, most often, to try and discredit him. He still looks white, regardless. The originals, clearly attest to this. Black extremists, need to stop, with their lies, fallacies, propaganda, about everything. Retards. Faking all history. Pseudo-history. "Afrocentrics" are the pariahs.

Brad Ley said...

The real irony, there was no black presence, in greater Europe, and no evidence, tangible evidence, to anything contrary. Blacks, never ruled, as Nobles, or Royal families, and had no input, other than the Moors, who had no influence, greater Europe. Fallacy. Moors, were left to the Southern regions, Europe, based almost entirely, in Spain, Peninsula, Mediterranean. They were also driven out of their strongholds, in Sicily, Sardinia, Malta, and finally, just left with Granada, Spain. Moors, were eventually, defeated, and finally, expelled, including the Moor Christian converts. Hence, that ended their journey. Nothing beyond that. Just depictions, Moors, in art, relics, ornaments, jewelry, or depicted in (White) European Coats of Arms, or emblems, symbolically, and not literal. All these families, were white, as all greater Europe, and the Moors' heads, were just depictions, like trophies, or some other historical significance. This began, with the Crusades, Holy Wars, to the Middle East, against the Muslims, Arabs, or Moors. Later, the Moor defeat. That is why you see Moors' heads, on European Coats of Arms, or other motifs etc.. Just symbolic, depictions. European dominance, prestige, victory, over either, Moors, Arabs, Muslims. Coats of Arms, are not Portraits. Moors, were not literal, in this sense. However, people, naively, think this implies, they were actual MOORS, and the true bearers? Nah, such is the ignorance, misinterpretation. These families, every last one, were white, European. Moors, were still Muslims, or Christian converts. Moors' heads, may even be shown wearing European regalia, or crowns. Hence, also a mocking. Or, some may either represent, a free slave, the slave trade, or some other historical significance. Perhaps, some semblance, Saint Maurice? Moors, were a novelty. There was no Moor presence, integration, or Moors, as originators, or Nobles, or families, in Europe, and they never established, or dominated anywhere, and had no influence, nor in ancient times, or more modern. Blacks, Africans, were not central to European life. Or, they were slaves, or freed slaves, or something else. Or, used as shipmates. Mere exceptions, blacks, Moors, Africans, in European life. Always, for good reason. The same, EUROPE, has lots of Religious art, iconography, that many show, darker, or African-type peoples, or black people, symbolically, or based in myth, or related, Coptic Church etc.. Yet, generally, also, based on North African Saints etc.. or, among, Middle Eastern themes.

Brad Ley said...

After reading these comments, I can tell, you people, are naive, arrogant, and confused, as badly as Mr Winters. Pushing this naive agenda, propaganda. Fallacy. Nah, Europe, has an immense history, far greater than any of you idiots, quite realize. It extends, vastly, and also ancient, as the peoples, localities, or as it relates, more ancient times. Sorry, you are fools. To the point, bigots. Narrow-minded, imbeciles. You want so to be Europe, it is ridiculous. Everything can be explained, or interpreted. Never what you think. You take things, too literal, and miss the finer print. You only see, what you are conditioned, or indoctrinated to see, believe and your mindless propaganda, agenda, thinking, blacks, or Africans, or Moors, were even that remotely significant. Well, sorry, they were not. Not even a fraction. Almost everything, can either be explained, debunked, corrected, contested, refuted, and set correct. You people are always wrong, always mindless, naive, impressionable. The same, you were never Europe, so, please, just quit.