Bernard Ortiz de Montellano has written articles claiming that any Afrocentric researcher who says Blacks founded civilization in Mesopotamia, the Olmecs were Black and there were Black Celts, these Afro-Americans are racists.
Montellano, when provided archaeological, genetic and linguistic data done by whites supporting the African origin of the Celts and etc., he acknowledges that the whites are just scientists, while the Afro-American researchers saying the same thing and citing these authors is called a racist. This double standard for white and Afro-American researchers prove that Montellano is a racist and a liar.
MacRitchie makes it clear the many early Britons were Black skinned. MacRitchies work is supported by genetics and archaeology. This was recently supported by the discovery of the "Bangled Lady". This Black woman was an elite in Britain in Roman times [
1 ]. Africans were first recorded in the north 1800 years ago, as Roman soldiers defending Hadrian's Wall; many Britons continue to carry African genes [
2 ].
Montellano should stop acting as if the Sumerians and Elamites were not Black. The physical anthropology is supported by modern researchers.
Col. Henry Rawlinson , used textual evidence to determine that a link existed between the Mesopotamians to their ancestors in Africa . Rawlinson called these people Kushites ( See: Henry Rawlinson, “ Letter read at the meeting of the Royal Asiatic Society on February 5, 1853”, The Athenaeum, (No. 1321) ,p.228; and H. Henry Rawlinson, “Note on the early History of Babylonia”, Journal Royal Asiatic Soc., 15, 215-259). The Kushites were Black. There is a positive relationship between crania from Africa and Eurasia which shows the Kushite origin of the Mesopotamians as claimed by Rawlinson. Modern researchers have confirmed that the ancient Mesopotamians were Africans. Ancient Sub-Saharan African skeletons have also been found in Mesopotamia [3 ]. The craniometric data indicates that continuity existed between ancient and medieval Sub-Saharan Africans in Mesopotamia [ 4 ]. Rawlinson, Dieulafoy, Tomczyk and Ricault are not Afrocentric researchers. If they can say the Mesopotamians were Black and not be racist, Montellano when he calls Afro-Americans who say the same thing racist, he was base his idea on his white supremacist views toward Afro-Americans researchers.
Bernard Ortiz de Motellano you are a liar, a white supremacist and a racist. You lie to deny the history of the Black Native Americans. Montellano says that Kennewick man was not a PaleoAmerican that was phenotypically African, Australian or Melanesian.
Racist Montellano genotype and craniometrics complement each other. The fact remains that Naia's DNA was contaminated and Kennewick man carries the African haplogroup X. Moreover Kennewick man is more related to Africans, Andamanese and Melanesians, rather than mongoloid Native Americans craniometrically and genetically.
Racist Montellano you should read the Kennewick Man DNA article before you writte the garbage about the ancestry of Kennewick man. Kennewick man is recognized as a PaleoAmerican therefore he has negro ancestry. The researchers claim the Kennewick man’s DNA is mainly related to Native Americans living in South America, rather than North America except for the Colville people on the West Coast. The researchers wrote
quote:
“Despite this similarity, Anzick-1 and Kennewick Man have dissimilar genetic affinities to contemporary Native Americans. In particular, we find that Anzick-1 is more closely related to Central/Southern Native Americans than is Kennewick Man (Extended Data Fig. 5). The pattern observed in Kennewick Man is mirrored in the Colville, who also show a high affinity with Southern populations (Fig. 2c), but are most closely related to a neighbouring population in the data set (Stswecem’c; Extended Data Fig. 4c).”
The authors also noted that:
“However, the genetic affinities of Kennewick Man reveal additional complexity in the population history of the Northern lineage. The finding that Kennewick is more closely related to Southern than many Northern Native Americans (Extended Data Fig. 4) suggests the presence of an additional Northern lineage that diverged from the common ancestral population of Anzick-1 and Southern Native Americans (Fig. 3). This branch would include both Colville and other tribes of the Pacific Northwest such as the Stswecem’c, who also appear symmetric to Kennewick with Southern Native Americans (Extended Data Fig. 4).”
The Pacific coast Native Americans were a mixture of mongoloid and Pacific Island Native Americans.
The Colville tribe which the researchers claim is related to Kennewick man is a Confederation of Indians who did not die of diseases or were murdered by whites so they could take their land.
The Colville tribe is the name given to various Christian Native American tribes that lived at Fort Colville. They include Native American groups that were not exterminated by the whites. The twelve bands of the Fort Colville are the Methow, Okanogan, Arrow Lakes, Sanpoil, Colville, Nespelem, Chelan, Entiat, Moses-Columbia, Wenatchi, Nez Perce, and Palus. These remnants of Pacific coast tribes formerly mixed with the Black Native Americans this is obvious when we look at Ohlone people who lived in missions on the West Coast.
From this painting you can see that the Pacific tribes, often were composed of Native Americans of diverse ethnic character.This means that the Colville tribes are probably admixed with the Black Native American tribes that formerly dominated the Pacific coast.
The authors of the Kennewick man DNA article, like most European writers attempt to lie about the negro origin of Kennewick man, but, the multivariate analysis of Kennewick man’s skull does not support their conclusion. The craniometric measurements confirm the negro origin of Kenewick man. The researchers wrote:
quote:
Although our individual-based craniometric analyses confirm that Kennewick Man tends to be more similar to Polynesian and Ainu peoples than to Native Americans, Kennewick Man’s pattern of craniometric affinity falls well within the range of affinity patterns evaluated for individual Native Americans (Supplementary Information 9). For example, the Arikara from North Dakota (the Native American tribe representing the geographically closest population in Howells’ data set to Kennewick), exhibit with high frequency closest affinities with Polynesians (Supplementary Information 9). Yet, the Arikara have typical Native-American mitochondrial DNA haplogroups30, as does Kennewick Man. We conclude that the currently available number of independent phenetic markers is too small, and within-population craniometric variation too large, to permit reliable reconstruction of the biological population affinities of Kennewick Man.
Arikara
The California Indians below look identical to Melanesians. This is confirmation of the authors finding that Kennewick man looked like Pacific Islanders.
Kennewick man carried mtDNA haplogroup X, this haplogroup is rare among United States Indians. This haplogroup is carried by Africans.
Amerindians carry the X hg. Amerindians and Europeans hg X are different (Person, 2004). Haplogroup X has also been found throughout Africa (Shimada et al,2006). Shimada et al (2006) believes that X(hX) is of African origin. Amerindian X is different from European hg X, skeletons from Brazil dating between 400-7000 BP have the transition np 16223 ( Martinez-Cruzado, 2001; Ribeiro-Dos-Santos,1996). Transition np 16223 is characteristic of African haplogroups. This suggest that Africans may have taken the X hg to the Americas in ancient times. This transference is supported by the haplogroups carried by Kennewick man.
Racist Bernard Ortiz Montellano you can't handle the truth because of your white supremacist ideas about the inability of Blacks to travel to America, without the help of Europeans. Montellano your racism will not be accepted and overlooked. Racist Montellano stop trying to steal the history of the Black Native Americans.
